I know I am not yet a designer, because when I see Apple’s Something’s in the Air posters I don’t think ooooo, a new typeface! But I’m working on it. It is a nice typeface.
I know I am not yet a designer, because when I see Apple’s Something’s in the Air posters I don’t think ooooo, a new typeface! But I’m working on it. It is a nice typeface.
Comments like this drive me nuts. There are several misconceptions that should be addressed, but I’d like to concentrate on this bit:
Don’t get me wrong; I think the switch to Java was a leap forward for the industry; I just wish people would have jumped to a better language.
Who cares about programming languages? Languages are a tiny part of the overall development stack. The PERL language is showing its age, but CPAN continues to make PERL a great choice for many UNIX applications. Ruby is interesting, but it’s Rails that attracted the industry’s attention. Objective-C would be nothing without Apple’s fine compliment of frameworks. Microsoft recognized the value of stacks over languages when it designed .NET’s CLR to support many languages. And finally, Java’s decade-long success as a server-side development platform wasn’t due to any stand-out features of the Java language — or even Sun’s marketing1. Its success was due to being a compelling development solution for server applications:
Development stacks don’t “win” based on their language — they win based on the ecosystem of developers, frameworks, and libraries that surround the language.
1 I find the idea that Sun’s marketing significantly impacted Java’s adoption to be laughable. During those early years, while Sun was the tech media’s darling child, Sun was also actively antagonizing its developer community, whose members were building open source alternatives to the expensive enterprise solutions being pushed by Sun and its industry partners.
